EAST TN FLOCK WATCH
BLOUNT COUNTY · PUBLIC HEARING
Regional details
├── Blount County
On Oct. 20, the full County Commission adopted Resolution 26-10-012, sponsored by Commissioners David Corwin and Roy Shields, setting a public hearing on the County’s use of fixed license plate reader cameras. The resolution had advanced 18-1 at the Oct. 13 workshop. Public hearing: Tuesday, Nov. 17 · 6:00 PM · Blount County Courthouse · Commission Room 430 The Sheriff’s Office will present, Commissioners may ask questions, and one hour is set aside for public comment. The County’s notice states no action will be taken at the hearing. The Sheriff’s Office operates 21 Flock cameras under a contract that runs through November 2028. The resolution cites a petition of about 1,000 signatures asking that the cameras be removed. Freedom from Flock, a Blount County residents group, is organizing attendance. Freedom from Flock Event → Official Hearing Notice → Read the Resolution → Watch the Oct. 13 Workshop → Official Flock Agenda Item →
├── Knox County
Knox County Commission voted Aug. 31 to ban fixed automatic license plate reader cameras. We continue to follow implementation of the adopted ordinance.
├── Kingston
Kingston’s Flock contract will not be renewed.
├── Sullivan County
Sullivan County suspended its use of Flock cameras.
├── Loudon County
The Flock issue remains active in Loudon County. Loudon County held a Commission workshop on Sept. 21. The issue remains under consideration.
└── Maryville
Maryville City Council held its Flock camera work session on September 18. Council heard discussion about the City’s license plate reader program and concerns raised by residents. Residents can contact the Mayor and City Council, state their position, and ask that the Flock camera program be placed before the elected Council for a public vote. Read Maryville Flock Brief → Contact Maryville City Council →
Know another East Tennessee vote, meeting, or Flock development? Let us know.

Blount County ALPR Transparency

East Tennessee ALPR Transparency Hub › Blount County ALPR Transparency

Blount County ALPR Transparency

Public records, the Sheriff’s Office’s own Flock transparency portal, a camera-level inventory, regional search data, government oversight, and open questions surrounding Blount County, Tennessee’s license plate reader system.

Updated October 2026
Status Records Investigation Ongoing
BCSO Flock Cameras 21 LPR (Portal) · 22 Source Records
Blount County Snapshot
BCSO Portal · Oct. 2026
21
Sheriff’s Office LPR Cameras
Up from 9 proposed in 2020
Searchable by BCSO
51
Government Cameras
21 BCSO · 16 Maryville · 14 Alcoa
Private Sharing
10
Private Entities
Businesses, HOAs, neighborhoods, private schools
Maryville Audit · July 2026
1,193
BCSO Searches
That included Maryville’s camera network
☰ Jump to
Section 1 · Overview

21 Sheriff’s Office Cameras Inside a Larger Network

The Blount County Sheriff’s Office’s original 2020 proposal sought nine stationary Flock Safety license plate readers. Flock Safety’s BCSO transparency portal, last updated October 10, 2026, now reports 21 total cameras, all 21 identified as LPR cameras: twelve more than the original proposal.

The same portal shows that BCSO’s reach extends well beyond its own cameras. It states that BCSO can search 16 cameras operated by the City of Maryville and 14 cameras operated by the City of Alcoa, and that 10 private entities, including businesses, HOAs, neighborhoods, and private schools, share their cameras with BCSO. Together, that is 51 government cameras plus an undisclosed number of private ones.

Maryville’s July 2026 network audit shows that access in use. That month, the Sheriff’s Office account ran 1,193 searches that included Maryville’s cameras, and a separate Blount County E-911 account ran 305.

21 BCSO Flock LPR cameras 9 cameras proposed in 2020 +12 above the original proposal 16 Maryville cameras searchable by BCSO 14 Alcoa cameras searchable by BCSO 10 private entities sharing with BCSO 1,193 BCSO searches into Maryville’s network, July 2026 7,339 hotlist hits in 30 days 30-day retention $47,250 original federal DOJ grant request Sheriff Berrong in office since 1989
The expansion question: The public record reviewed here documents a nine-camera proposal in 2020. Flock’s current transparency portal reports 21 LPR cameras. Records identifying when the additional cameras were approved, how they were funded, and whether the expansion received a standalone public discussion or vote remain important accountability questions.
Why county-level ALPR matters more, not less: A county network fills the geographic gaps between city systems. A driver who never enters Maryville or Alcoa city limits can still be scanned on county roads. BCSO’s original project description specifically contemplated obtaining neighboring agencies’ data to create what it called “a much larger grid.” BCSO’s 2026 portal confirms that grid now includes both city networks.

Source: Flock Safety, Blount County TN SO Transparency Portal, last updated October 10, 2026; captured by MaryvillePrivacy.org on October 10, 2026.

Section 2 · BCSO’s Cameras

Where the Sheriff’s Office Cameras Are

MaryvillePrivacy.org’s camera inventory, compiled from a December 2025 camera-location dataset, classifies 22 source records to the Sheriff’s Office at 21 working locations. Two records sit at the same spot: US 411 South at the county line, where a Flock Falcon and a Flock Falcon Highway are both listed. BCSO’s portal separately reports 21 LPR cameras.

An independent check that matches: BCSO’s portal states it can search 16 Maryville cameras and 14 Alcoa cameras. The inventory, built separately from the camera-location dataset, classifies exactly 16 records to Maryville Police and 14 to Alcoa Police.
Map of 55 identified Flock camera records in Blount County, Tennessee: Maryville Police in blue, Alcoa Police in green, Blount County Sheriff's Office in brown, Lowe's Alcoa in purple
All 55 records by operator. ● Sheriff’s Office 22 · ● Maryville PD 16 · ● Alcoa PD 14 · ● Lowe’s Alcoa 3
Blount County Sheriff’s Office 22 records · 21 locations
CameraLocation / DirectionFlock IDDeviceCoordinatesSource Record
01Old Knoxville Hwy/Co-Op Rd. (Inbound)9669Falcon35.868178, -83.944201Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
02Morganton @ Railway Dr (Inbound)9667Falcon35.674413, -84.127166Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
03Sevierville Rd @ Hinkle Rd (Inbound)273723Falcon35.848771, -83.786679Created Apr. 14, 2025
Updated Dec. 10, 2025
04Louisville Rd @ Jeffries Ct (Outbound)274651Falcon35.815703, -84.028985Created Apr. 16, 2025
Updated Nov. 27, 2025
05411 South at County Line (Inbound)11063Falcon35.650842, -84.130941Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
05LRHwy 411 South @ County Line (Inbound)288241Falcon Highway35.650923, -84.130539Created May 19, 2025
Updated Nov. 27, 2025
06S Singleton Station at Cusick Rd (Toward Rockford)10667Falcon35.829572, -83.951402Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
07321 West at County Line (Inbound)11062Falcon35.740513, -84.161104Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Nov. 27, 2025
08Jefferies Hollow Rd at Keener Rd (Inbound)10664Falcon35.825648, -83.773366Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
09Burnett Station Rd at Black Oak Ridge (Inbound Toward Nails Creek Rd)10662Falcon35.875048, -83.791477Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
10Old Niles Ferry Rd at Old Clover Hill Rd (Inbound)10665Falcon35.694550, -84.033226Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
11Old Knoxville Hwy at Pellissippi Off-Ramp (Outbound toward Rockford)10666Falcon35.806293, -83.939911Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
12Calderwood Hwy at Mullins Way (Inbound)10663Falcon35.614256, -84.090213Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
13321 E @ Heritage High School (EB toward Walland)78657Falcon35.759175, -83.864680Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
14William Blount Dr @ County Farm Rd (SB toward 411S)78656Falcon35.739845, -84.038118Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
15Huffstettler Rd @ Bart Griffin (between schools towards Mint Rd)256470Falcon35.675944, -84.029734Created Mar. 17, 2025
Updated Nov. 27, 2025
16N Farnum St @ E College - (Towards School)247846Falcon35.760178, -84.133229Created Feb. 25, 2025
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
17Brickmill Rd @ Lanier Rd - NB247845Falcon35.623440, -84.096384Created Feb. 25, 2025
Updated Nov. 27, 2025
01-PFParks Ferry Rd. - Inbound21314Falcon35.786651, -84.158357Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
01-CLAlcoa Trail @ Clayton Homes - Inbound78484Falcon35.809183, -83.951271Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
02-CLAlcoa Trail @ Clayton Homes North Entrance - Inbound78483Falcon35.811582, -83.947915Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 3, 2025
03-CLAlcoa Trail @ Clayton Academy Northbound - Inbound78485Falcon35.812514, -83.946343Created Mar. 26, 2024
Updated Dec. 4, 2025
Records that name schools: Four BCSO-classified records name schools in their own location descriptions: #13 321 E @ Heritage High School; #15 Huffstettler Rd @ Bart Griffin (between schools towards Mint Rd); #16 N Farnum St @ E College (Towards School); and 03-CL Alcoa Trail @ Clayton Academy Northbound. BCSO’s portal lists monitoring “sex offenders near our schools” among the system’s uses.
Open question: four records break BCSO’s numbering. Most BCSO-classified records are numbered 01 through 17, plus 05LR. Four are not: 01-PF (Parks Ferry Rd.) and 01-CL, 02-CL, and 03-CL (Alcoa Trail at Clayton Homes and Clayton Academy). BCSO’s portal also reports 10 private entities sharing cameras with BCSO, including private schools. Whether these four are Sheriff’s Office cameras or private cameras shared with BCSO is not established, and the answer affects how the 22 inventory records reconcile with the portal’s 21.

Inventory records are a December 2025 historical snapshot. “Record created” dates come from the source system and are not installation dates. BCSO attribution remains a working classification.

Section 3 · Who Searches the Region

Who Searches the Networks Around Blount County

Flock logs every search that includes an agency’s camera network in that agency’s network audit. MaryvillePrivacy.org obtained the July 2026 network audits for Maryville and Alcoa, the two city networks BCSO says it can search. BCSO’s own network audit is not public.

July 2026 Maryville PD Alcoa PD BCSO
Searches that included the network1,403,5941,922,959Not public
Agency accounts running them3,4763,651Not public
Tennessee agency accounts154Not in productionNot public
Searches that included both cities1,284,759 shared search IDsNot public

Alcoa’s production filtered out searches by Tennessee agencies, so its totals cover out-of-state and federal accounts only. Maryville’s production included Tennessee agencies.

What a recorded search shows: A recorded search included the audited network. It does not show that an account deliberately targeted Blount County, viewed a particular camera, obtained a hit, or opened a case. Many searches included thousands of networks.
The missing audit: For the two neighboring city networks, the July 2026 audits recorded more than a million searches each. The record that would show who searches BCSO’s own 21 cameras, BCSO’s network audit, is not public.

Blount County Accounts in Maryville’s Audit

BCSO’s portal states that it can search Maryville’s 16 cameras. Maryville’s July 2026 network audit shows two Blount County accounts did so that month.

Account, as named in the audit Searches First search (ET) Last search (ET)
Blount County TN SO1,193July 1, 2:34 a.m.July 31, 10:26 p.m.
Blount County TN E-911305July 2, 6:25 p.m.July 30, 8:21 p.m.
Total1,498About 0.1% of the 1,403,594 searches that included Maryville’s network

The Sheriff’s Office account averaged about 38 searches a day across the month. Nearly all searches that reached Maryville’s cameras came from outside Blount County.

Two numbers that need explaining: BCSO’s portal reports 132 search sessions in the 30 days before October 10, 2026. Maryville’s audit records 1,193 BCSO searches that included Maryville’s network in July 2026 alone. The figures cover different months and may count different things. The portal does not define a “search session” or say how many searches one session contains.
A second Blount County account: The Blount County TN E-911 account ran 305 searches that included Maryville’s network. BCSO’s portal describes deputy training and access rules and refers to verifying hits through “our Communications Center,” but it does not describe a separate E-911 Flock account. Which agency administers that account, who uses it, and which policy governs it are not established.
What the Alcoa audit cannot show: BCSO’s portal states it can search Alcoa’s 14 cameras. Alcoa’s July 2026 production filtered out Tennessee agency searches, so how often BCSO’s searches reached Alcoa’s network cannot be measured from that file. Maryville’s production is the only one of the two that shows Tennessee agencies, including BCSO.

Source: Flock Safety network audit for Maryville TN PD, July 2026, obtained from the City of Maryville through a Tennessee Public Records Act request and analyzed offline by MaryvillePrivacy.org. Times are Eastern.

Section 4 · BCSO’s Flock Portal

What the Sheriff’s Office Publishes

BCSO publishes a Flock Safety transparency portal. It states that the agency’s use of the system is governed by BCSO General Order 2.17.10 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-302, links the general order, and reports usage statistics for the last 30 days. No comparable public portal for the Alcoa Police Department has been located.

Portal figure As reported, October 10, 2026
Total cameras21, all LPR
Data retention30 days
Search sessions, last 30 days132
Camera alerts, last 30 days225
Hotlist hits, last 30 days7,339
Hotlists alerted onNCIC, NCMEC Amber Alert
Top offense types searchedFinancial crime; wanted person; larceny and theft; kidnapping and abduction; missing or endangered person
Maryville cameras BCSO can search16
Alcoa cameras BCSO can search14
Private entities sharing with BCSO10 (businesses, HOAs, neighborhoods, private schools)
Governing policyBCSO General Order 2.17.10
What can trigger a hit: The portal lists the NCIC record types that can generate a hit: extreme risk protection orders, gang or suspected terrorist records, immigration violators, missing persons, protection orders, protective interest records, sex offenders, stolen plates, stolen vehicles, supervised release individuals, violent persons, and outstanding warrants. The portal states that a hit alone never justifies a stop and must be independently verified.

Source: Flock Safety, Blount County TN SO Transparency Portal. Figures are as displayed on October 10, 2026 and change daily.

Section 5 · Portal Claims and the Record

What the Portal Says, and What the Record Shows

The portal combines BCSO’s own statements with vendor-written “Myth vs. Fact” text. Several statements are accurate as far as they go but leave out what other records show.

The portal says What the record shows
The cameras “do not follow a vehicle’s day-to-day movements.” The portal’s own featured case describes “Flock alerts” showing a stolen truck “moving through Sevier, Knox, and Blount counties in the overnight and afternoon hours.” A Flock training deck obtained through TPRA describes Convoy and Multi-Geo tools for searching travel histories.
“nothing is shared automatically. Participation is opt-in.” Opt-in sharing still reaches nationwide. In July 2026, searches that included Maryville’s network came from 3,476 agency accounts, and Alcoa’s from 3,651 accounts outside Tennessee, both networks BCSO says it can search. The portal does not list the agencies BCSO shares its own data with.
“Every search is tied to a documented reason and a case number” and “every keystroke is logged and subject to audit.” BCSO’s audit logs are the records that would verify this. They are not public, and BCSO denied MaryvillePrivacy.org’s September 2026 records request on identification grounds (Section 9).
BCSO “cannot access any information in Flock that is greater than 720 hours old, as our agreement mandates its destruction.” The contract text quoted on the same portal gives Flock a “perpetual” right to use and distribute Anonymized Data created from BCSO’s data (Section 6). The portal does not say whether that data is deleted at 30 days. Its own state-law summary also allows longer retention where there is an evidentiary need.
“Your community owns 100% of your data and it will never be sold.” Ownership stays with BCSO (contract Section 4.1), but BCSO grants Flock an “irrevocable, worldwide license” to use its data to provide Flock’s services, and a “perpetual” right to “use and distribute” Anonymized Data, including for “other Flock offerings.” Not selling data is different from not using or distributing it.
“Flock’s cloud environment has never been breached,” with “required Multi-Factor Authentication.” In November 2025, Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi asked the FTC to investigate Flock, writing that Flock did not require customers to use multi-factor authentication and that passwords for at least 35 Flock customer accounts had reportedly been stolen. The portal does not say when multi-factor authentication became required.
Credit where it is due: BCSO publishes a written general order, usage statistics, and an explanation of hotlists, more than the City of Alcoa publishes. The points above concern what those statements leave out. They are not an allegation that any deputy misused the system.

Sources: BCSO Transparency Portal; Who Is Searching Blount County?; Flock’s Multi-Geo and Convoy Tools; Sen. Wyden press release, November 3, 2025.

Section 6 · Contract Section 4.3

What the Contract Text Allows Flock to Do With the Data

The portal answers the question “What does the contract between BCSO and Flock Safety say, specifically, about the data collected by Flock Cameras?” by quoting three clauses. Section 4.3 governs what happens to the data beyond BCSO’s own use.

Section 4.3, as quoted on BCSO’s portal “4.3 Anonymized Data. Flock shall have the right to collect, analyze, and anonymize Customer Data and Customer Generated Data to the extent such anonymization renders the data nonidentifiable to create Anonymized Data to use and perform the Services and related systems and technologies, including the training of machine learning algorithms. Customer hereby grants Flock a non-exclusive, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free right to use and distribute such Anonymized Data to improve and enhance the Services and for other development, diagnostic and corrective purposes, and other Flock offerings. Parties understand that the aforementioned license is required for continuity of Services. Flock does not own and shall not sell Anonymized Data.”
The text says What that means in plain terms
“Flock shall have the right to collect, analyze, and anonymize”A grant of permission to Flock, not a duty. Nothing in the clause requires Flock to anonymize data, or to anonymize it before collecting or analyzing it.
“to the extent such anonymization renders the data nonidentifiable”Describes when the output counts as Anonymized Data. The clause does not define “nonidentifiable,” name a method, or provide for any test or audit.
“including the training of machine learning algorithms”Training Flock’s machine learning systems is a stated permitted use.
“non-exclusive, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free right to use and distribute”The right does not expire, including after the underlying records are deleted at 30 days and after the contract ends. Flock may distribute the data, not only use it.
“and other Flock offerings”Use is not limited to the services BCSO pays for.
“required for continuity of Services”BCSO cannot keep the service without granting this license.
“Flock does not own and shall not sell Anonymized Data”Selling is barred. Distribution is expressly permitted.
Why anonymization is hard for location records: A study of mobility data from 1.5 million people found that four points in time and place were enough to single out 95% of them (de Montjoye et al., Scientific Reports, 2013). A license plate read is, by design, a point in time and place.
What the text does not establish: Whether Flock has exercised these rights with BCSO’s data, what anonymization method Flock uses, or whether BCSO data has been used to train any model. The portal quotes the contract; the signed agreement and any order forms or data addenda are public records that can be requested. This is a plain-language reading of the quoted text, not a legal opinion.

Sources: BCSO Transparency Portal, “More Info”; de Montjoye et al., “Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility,” Scientific Reports 3, 1376 (2013).

Section 7 · Program History

Public Record: BCSO Flock ALPR Procurement, 2020

Then vs. now: BCSO’s 2020 proposal sought nine Flock cameras. Flock Safety’s current transparency portal reports 21 LPR cameras for the Blount County Sheriff’s Office as of October 2026.
  • August 2020: BCSO sought nine stationary Flock Safety license plate readers, according to a project description submitted to the Blount County Commission.
  • Funding source: Project Safe Neighborhood East Tennessee, a U.S. Department of Justice initiative. The total grant request for purchase, installation, maintenance, and operating costs was $47,250.
  • NCIC integration: the proposed system would compare scans against National Crime Information Center hot sheets that the project description said were “updated every 24 hours.”
  • The regional-hub plan: after installation, BCSO said it would request data from Oak Ridge, Maryville, Alcoa, Lenoir City, and other local agencies using the system.
  • The county project description stated: “This will allow for local access to a much larger grid and promotes interoperability.”
  • Personnel appearing in the record: the project description was authored by Shankle of BCSO. Public Information Officer Marian O’Briant responded regarding camera placement. Then-Maryville Police Chief Tony Crisp told the Daily Times that Alcoa and the county had been looking at the system since Maryville obtained it.
The “Much Larger Grid”
BCSO COUNTY ALPR  (2020 plan)
│
├── 9 Flock cameras proposed
├── NCIC hot-sheet sync (24 hours)
│
▼
"A MUCH LARGER GRID"
│
└── request data from:
    ├── Oak Ridge
    ├── Maryville
    ├── Alcoa
    ├── Lenoir City
    └── other local agencies
        │
        ▼
    REGIONAL INTEROPERABILITY

Sources: The Daily Times, “BCSO looking to get stationary license plate readers” (August 2020) ; Flock Safety, Blount County Sheriff’s Office Transparency Portal .

Section 8 · County Commission

The Blount County Commission and the County’s ALPR Program

Public notice: This information is provided for transparency and government accountability, not as a call for harassment. Officials are listed only in their public governmental capacity. The policy request is specific: publicly review the county’s ALPR program, require transparency for its operation and expansion, and consider ending or declining future funding or renewal.
New Commission: Blount County’s 2026 to 2030 County Commission took office on September 1, 2026, following the August 6 county election. Several commissioners listed on older county webpages and records are no longer members of the Commission.
Why the current Commission matters: The existing ALPR program predates many members of the newly elected Commission. That does not make new commissioners responsible for its original approval. It does, however, give the current Commission an opportunity to examine how the system grew from the nine cameras described in the 2020 proposal to the 21 LPR cameras now reported by Flock Safety, and to determine whether future funding, expansion, or renewal should continue.

The following is the Blount County Commission for the 2026 to 2030 term, based on Blount County’s September 2026 announcement identifying the officials sworn into office.

District / Seat Commissioner Status
District 1, Seat A Jessica Hannah Current
District 1, Seat B Keenan Sudderth New term
District 2, Seat A Mike Akard Current
District 2, Seat B Joe Cooper New term
District 3, Seat A Tanner Jones New term
District 3, Seat B Neal Porter New term
District 4, Seat A Robbie Bennett Current
District 4, Seat B Robert G. Simerly New term
District 5, Seat A Bob Ramsey New term
District 5, Seat B Rick Carver Current
District 6, Seat A Nick Bright Current
District 6, Seat B Misty Davis Current
District 7, Seat A Shannon Effler New term
District 7, Seat B Jasmine Satterfield New term
District 8, Seat A Roy L. “Hoot” Shields New term
District 8, Seat B Jeff Jopling Current
District 9, Seat A David Corwin New term
District 9, Seat B Chip Blankenship New term
District 10, Seat A Doug Moore New term
District 10, Seat B David Wells Current

Executive and program officials

  • James Lee Berrong, Blount County Sheriff. The ALPR program operates through the Sheriff’s Office, and the original 2020 Flock project proposal occurred during his administration.
  • Jared Anderson, Blount County Mayor. Anderson took office as County Mayor on September 1, 2026.

Who approved the original program?

The current 2026 to 2030 Commission should not automatically be attributed with decisions made by previous commissions. The 2018 to 2022 County Commission was serving when BCSO presented its original nine-camera proposal in 2020.

Determining exactly who approved the original grant, subsequent renewals, and the expansion from nine proposed cameras to the 21 cameras currently reported by Flock requires the corresponding agendas, meeting minutes, grant resolutions, contracts, budget records, and recorded votes.

The question for today’s Commission: Regardless of who originally approved the system, the current Commission can ask how Blount County reached 21 LPR cameras, demand the complete public record, require a standalone public discussion of future surveillance spending, and decide whether county funding or renewal should continue.

Sources: Blount County Commission ; Blount County Commission structure ; Blount County’s September 2026 announcement identifying newly sworn county officials.

Section 9 · Request BCSO Records

Requesting BCSO Records: Denial and State Open Records Guidance

Tennessee law gives citizens the right to request public records, including by email when an agency uses email for official business. In September 2026, MaryvillePrivacy.org tested that process with the Blount County Sheriff’s Office. BCSO received the request form and Tennessee photo identification, but later denied the request because the driver’s license had been partially redacted.

The dispute was then presented to the Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel. On September 11, 2026, Open Records Counsel provided written guidance directly to BCSO stating that if the requester’s name, address, and expiration date are visible, the identification is sufficient to establish Tennessee citizenship and “the request should be processed.”

What happened?
BCSO PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
│
├── SEPT. 4
│   ├── Request form submitted by email
│   ├── Tennessee driver's license provided
│   ├── License number redacted for privacy
│   └── Name, photo + Tennessee address remained visible
│
├── BCSO RECORDS / ADMIN
│   ├── Received the request
│   ├── Confirmed receipt of the ID
│   └── Forwarded the request for processing
│
├── SEPT. 8 AND 9
│   ├── BCSO rejects the redacted ID
│   ├── Says identification cannot be
│   │   "altered from its original form"
│   └── Formally denies the records request
│
├── OPEN RECORDS COUNSEL
│   ├── Dispute presented to Tennessee OORC
│   └── SEPT. 11: OORC sends guidance to BCSO
│
└── OORC POSITION
    ├── Name must be visible
    ├── Address must be visible
    ├── Expiration date must be visible
    └── If so, ID is sufficient and
        "the request should be processed"
What Tennessee law says: When a governmental entity requires a copy request to be in writing, it must accept a request submitted by email when the governmental entity uses email to transact official business. Tenn. Code Ann. § 10-7-503(a)(7)(A)(iv) .
Identification: Tennessee law allows a governmental entity to require a government-issued photo ID that includes the person’s address. The statute does not state that a driver’s license number must be disclosed. The Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel similarly explains that an agency may require government-issued photo identification containing an address. Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel .
September 9, 2026: Request Denied. BCSO stated that it would not accept identification “altered from its original form” and later stated, “Our agency has denied your request.” The written BCSO response form identified the basis for denial as “No proof of Tennessee citizenship was presented with your request.”
Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury
State Open Records Guidance
Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel
What Does a Redacted ID Look Like?
Example: Tennessee Sample Driver License

This Tennessee sample driver license illustrates how selected information can be obscured while other identifying information remains visible.

Illustrative example only: this sample is not the identification submitted to BCSO.

September 11, 2026: After reviewing the dispute, the Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel sent written guidance directly to BCSO.

Open Records Counsel stated that if the requester’s name, address, and expiration date are visible, its position is that the identification is “sufficient to establish Tennessee citizenship and the request should be processed.”

Check an ID photo before sending it

If you choose to send identification electronically, check the image for hidden GPS, device, date, camera, and other embedded metadata. The tool below analyzes the photo locally in your browser and does not upload it to MaryvillePrivacy.org.

MARYVILLE PRIVACY PHOTO CHECKER

What does your photo reveal?

Choose a photo to check for hidden metadata such as GPS location, date and time, device make/model, and editing software.

✓ Your photo stays on your device. This checker reads the selected file locally in your browser. The photograph is not uploaded to MaryvillePrivacy.org.
No photo selected
No EXIF does not mean anonymous. An app or website may separately collect information such as your IP address, device identifiers, account information, approximate location, or other technical data even when a photo contains no embedded GPS metadata.
What this tool checks

For supported files, the checker looks for embedded GPS coordinates, capture date/time, camera or phone make/model, software, orientation, image dimensions, and other common EXIF fields.

JPEG and PNG files are fully inspected, including embedded EXIF/GPS data (JPEG) and text metadata (PNG). WebP files are inspected for an embedded EXIF metadata block; an XMP metadata block, if present, is detected but its contents are not parsed. HEIC and HEIF files are not inspected for embedded metadata by this tool, regardless of what the browser itself can display. When a file’s metadata cannot be fully inspected, this checker says so rather than reporting a clean result.

The plugin sends only anonymous aggregate counter events such as “tool used,” “metadata found,” “GPS found,” “no metadata found,” or “inspection incomplete.” It does not send the photo, filename, GPS coordinates, EXIF values, or other photo contents to the server.

Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury Sources: BCSO September 2026 public-records correspondence and denial response; Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel September 2026 correspondence; Blount County Records Management ; Tenn. Code Ann. § 10-7-503 ; Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel .

Section 10 · Records Still Needed

What the Public Record Does Not Yet Explain

The unresolved expansion: The public record reviewed to date does not explain how the county’s ALPR network grew from the original nine-camera proposal to the 21 LPR cameras currently reported by Flock Safety, or how the 22 inventory records reconcile with that count.

Records still worth requesting from the Blount County Sheriff’s Office:

  • BCSO’s Flock network audit, showing every agency search that included BCSO’s cameras
  • BCSO’s user audit log, including the search reasons and case numbers the portal describes
  • The list of agencies BCSO shares data with, in both directions
  • The 10 private entities sharing cameras with BCSO, with camera counts and locations
  • The signed Flock agreement, order forms, renewals, and any data processing or anonymization addendum
  • The administering agency, users, and governing policy for the Blount County TN E-911 Flock account
  • A definition of the portal’s “search session,” and BCSO’s monthly search totals
  • From the City of Alcoa: the July 2026 network audit with Tennessee agency searches included, which its production filtered out
  • A current BCSO camera list, to reconcile the 22 inventory records with the portal’s 21
  • Results of the random audits described in General Order 2.17.10
  • The number and categories of locally created hotlist entries
  • Agendas, minutes, budget lines, and votes for each expansion beyond the 2020 proposal

This investigation will be updated as additional public records become available. Where the underlying record has not yet been established, this page does not attribute a particular decision, approval, or vote to an individual official.

Section 11 · Drone Expansion

Flock Pitched a Regional Drone Program Including Blount County

  • Tennessee public records show Flock Safety pitched a regional drone as first responder program involving Maryville, Alcoa, Blount County, and the Blount County 911 Center.
  • The estimated regional program cost was $300,000 to $600,000 per year.
  • The proposal shows how an ALPR network can become the foundation for a broader surveillance system involving cameras, vehicle tracking, real-time intelligence software, and police drones.

Full investigation: Inside Maryville’s Flock AI Drone Program →

Section 12 · Map

Documented Camera Locations

Camera locations via DeFlock, centered on Blount County, Tennessee. Crowdsourced; absence of a marker is not proof a camera is absent.

For exact coordinates and Flock IDs, see the 55-record camera inventory on the Maryville Flock Camera Map.

The accountability request: Blount County residents can ask every commissioner and county official to publish the complete ALPR record, require a standalone public vote for future surveillance spending, and end or decline renewal of the county’s license plate surveillance program.

This page is grounded in public records, Tennessee Public Records Act productions, county meeting materials, Flock Safety’s Blount County Sheriff’s Office transparency portal (captured October 10, 2026), a December 2025 camera-location dataset, vendor materials, and independent reporting. It documents structural facts and the public record; it does not allege criminal wrongdoing by any named party. Where a specific vote or record is not yet established, this page says so.